home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Offline 2 / NetNews Offline Volume 2.iso / news / comp / lang / c++-part2 / 12396 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1996-08-05  |  1.2 KB
  1. Path: newshost.nmt.edu!thumper!proterin
  2. From: proterin@thumper.nmt.edu (Paul Rotering)
  3. Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
  4. Subject: Re: C++ vs Delphi 2.0
  5. Date: 19 Mar 1996 20:56:13 GMT
  6. Organization: New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
  7. Message-ID: <4in71d$ief@newshost.nmt.edu>
  8. References: <825673272.2083@axiombc.demon.co.uk> <4hmop6$snh@cdshub.cdc.com> <4ims71$oh3@hawk.pix.za>
  9. NNTP-Posting-Host: thumper.nmt.edu
  10.  
  11. In article <4ims71$oh3@hawk.pix.za>, Pri$m <prism@pixie.co.za> wrote:
  12.  
  13. >(This is a personal opinion) to fit smoothly ith OOP. Additionally, if
  14. >you use Delphi, you'll find that the general feel of it discourages
  15. >one from using code, and directly controlling things. This can't be
  16. >good! 
  17.  
  18. Exactly.  It seems that the only people who actually *write* most of
  19. their own Delphi code are component writers.  The Delphi IDE and
  20. documentation try to convice you that you needn't do more than twiddle
  21. with component properties.  However, I've yet to see a useful component
  22. that didn't need help at a relatively low level.
  23.  
  24.  
  25.  
  26.  
  27.  
  28. -- 
  29. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  30. -Paul Rotering                                http://www.nmt.edu/~proterin/
  31.  proterin@nmt.edu
  32.  protein@emrtc.nmt.edu
  33.